• Sculpted by starlight: A meteorite witne

    From ScienceDaily@1337:3/111 to All on Tue Jul 6 21:30:34 2021
    Sculpted by starlight: A meteorite witness to the solar system's birth
    Researchers use unusual meteorite to gain insight into our solar system's past, present

    Date:
    July 6, 2021
    Source:
    Washington University in St. Louis
    Summary:
    Scientists knew a burst of UV light left its mark on our solar
    system.

    Now they know the source of that light.



    FULL STORY ==========================================================================
    In 2011, scientists confirmed a suspicion: There was a split in the local cosmos. Samples of the solar wind brought back to Earth by the Genesis
    mission definitively determined oxygen isotopes in the sun differ from
    those found on Earth, the moon and the other planets and satellites in
    the solar system.


    ========================================================================== Early in the solar system's history, material that would later coalesce
    into planets had been hit with a hefty dose of ultraviolet light, which
    can explain this difference. Where did it come from? Two theories emerged: Either the ultraviolet light came from our then-young sun, or it came
    from a large nearby star in the sun's stellar nursery.

    Now, researchers from the lab of Ryan Ogliore, assistant professor of
    physics in Arts & Sciences at Washington University in St. Louis, have determined which was responsible for the split. It was most likely light
    from a long-dead massive star that left this impression on the rocky
    bodies of the solar system.

    The study was led by Lionel Vacher, a postdoctoral research associate
    in the physics department's Laboratory for Space Sciences.

    Their results are published in the journal Geochimica et Cosmochimica
    Acta.

    "We knew that we were born of stardust: that is, dust created by other
    stars in our galactic neighborhood were part of the building blocks of
    the solar system," Ogliore said.

    "But this study showed that starlight had a profound effect on our
    origins as well." *Tiny time capsule


    ==========================================================================
    All of that profundity was packed into a mere 85 grams of rock, a piece
    of an asteroid found as a meteorite in Algeria in 1990, named Acfer
    094. Asteroids and planets formed from the same presolar material,
    but they've been influenced by different natural processes. The rocky
    building blocks that coalesced to form asteroids and planets were broken
    up and battered; vaporized and recombined; and compressed and heated. But
    the asteroid that Acfer 094 came from managed to survive for 4.6 billion
    years mostly unscathed.

    "This is one of the most primitive meteorites in our collection,"
    Vacher said.

    "It was not heated significantly. It contains porous regions and tiny
    grains that formed around other stars. It is a reliable witness to the
    solar system's formation." Acfer 094 is also the only meteorite that
    contains cosmic symplectite, an intergrowth of iron-oxide and iron-sulfide
    with extremely heavy oxygen isotopes -- a significant finding.

    The sun contains about 6% more of the lightest oxygen isotope compared
    with the rest of the solar system. That can be explained by ultraviolet
    light shining on the solar system's building blocks, selectively breaking
    apart carbon monoxide gas into its constituent atoms. That process
    also creates a reservoir of much heavier oxygen isotopes. Until cosmic symplectite, however, no one had found this heavy isotope signature in
    samples of solar system materials.

    With only three isotopes, however, simply finding the heavy oxygen
    isotopes wasn't enough to answer the question of the origin of the
    light. Different ultraviolet spectra could have created the same result.



    ========================================================================== "That's when Ryan came up with the idea of sulfur isotopes," Vacher said.

    Sulfur's four isotopes would leave their marks in different ratios
    depending on the spectrum of ultraviolet light that irradiated hydrogen
    sulfide gas in the proto-solar system. A massive star and a young sun-like
    star have different ultraviolet spectra.

    Cosmic symplectite formed when ices on the asteroid melted and reacted
    with small pieces of iron-nickel metal. In addition to oxygen, cosmic symplectite contains sulfur in iron sulfide. If its oxygen witnessed this ancient astrophysical process -- which led to the heavy oxygen isotopes -- perhaps its sulfur did, too.

    "We developed a model," Ogliore said. "If I had a massive star,
    what isotope anomalies would be created? What about for a young,
    sun-like star? The precision of the model depends on the experimental
    data. Fortunately, other scientists have done great experiments on
    what happens to isotope ratios when hydrogen sulfide is irradiated
    by ultraviolet light." Sulfur and oxygen isotope measurements of
    cosmic symplectite in Acfer 094 proved another challenge. The grains,
    tens of micrometers in size and a mixture of minerals, required new
    techniques on two different in-situ secondary-ion mass spectrometers:
    the NanoSIMS in the physics department (with assistance from Nan Liu,
    research assistant professor in physics) and the 7f-GEO in the Department
    of Earth and Planetary Sciences, also in Arts & Sciences.

    *Putting the puzzle together It helped to have friends in earth and
    planetary sciences, particularly David Fike, professor of earth and
    planetary sciences and director of Environmental Studies in Arts &
    Sciences, and Clive Jones, research scientist in earth and planetary
    sciences.

    "They are experts in high-precision in-situ sulfur isotope measurements
    for biogeochemistry," Ogliore said. "Without this collaboration, we would
    not have achieved the precision we needed to differentiate between the
    young sun and massive star scenarios." The sulfur isotope measurements
    of cosmic symplectite were consistent with ultraviolet irradiation from
    a massive star, but did not fit the UV spectrum from the young sun. The
    results give a unique perspective on the astrophysical environment of the
    sun's birth 4.6 billion years ago. Neighboring massive stars were likely
    close enough that their light affected the solar system's formation. Such
    a nearby massive star in the night sky would appear brighter than the
    full moon.

    Today, we can look to the skies and see a similar origin story play out elsewhere in the galaxy.

    "We see nascent planetary systems, called proplyds, in the Orion nebula
    that are being photoevaporated by ultraviolet light from nearby massive
    O and B stars," Vacher said.

    "If the proplyds are too close to these stars, they can be
    torn apart, and planets never form. We now know our own solar
    system at its birth was close enough to be affected by the
    light of these stars," he said. "But thankfully, not too close." ========================================================================== Story Source: Materials provided by
    Washington_University_in_St._Louis. Original written by Brandie
    Jefferson. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.


    ========================================================================== Journal Reference:
    1. Lionel G. Vacher, Ryan C. Ogliore, Clive Jones, Nan Liu, David
    A. Fike.

    Cosmic symplectite recorded irradiation by nearby massive stars
    in the solar system's parent molecular cloud. Geochimica et
    Cosmochimica Acta, 2021; DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2021.06.026 ==========================================================================

    Link to news story: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2021/07/210706115405.htm

    --- up 8 weeks, 4 days, 22 hours, 45 minutes
    * Origin: -=> Castle Rock BBS <=- Now Husky HPT Powered! (1337:3/111)