• Imaging identifies breast cancer patient

    From ScienceDaily@1337:3/111 to All on Tue Feb 2 21:30:36 2021
    Imaging identifies breast cancer patients unlikely to benefit from
    hormone therapy
    Findings could help improve treatment decisions

    Date:
    February 2, 2021
    Source:
    Washington University School of Medicine
    Summary:
    Hormone therapy can be very effective for so-called estrogen
    receptor- positive breast cancer. But it only works for a little
    more than half of women who receive the treatment. In a small
    study, researchers found that women whose tumors did not respond
    to a one-day estrogen challenge did not benefit from hormone
    therapy. The findings could help doctors choose treatments most
    likely to help their patients.



    FULL STORY ========================================================================== Hormone therapy commonly is given as a targeted treatment for women
    whose cancer cells carry receptors for estrogen. But the therapy only
    works for about half of all patients. Until now, there hasn't been a
    good way to reliably predict who will benefit and who will not.


    ========================================================================== Researchers at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis have
    shown they can distinguish patients likely or unlikely to benefit from
    hormone therapy using an imaging test that measures the function of the estrogen receptors in their cancer cells. In a small phase 2 clinical
    trial, the researchers showed that the cancers of all patients with
    working estrogen receptors remained stable or improved on hormone therapy,
    and progressed in all women with nonfunctional estrogen receptors. The findings, published Feb. 2 in Nature Communications, could help doctors
    choose among treatment options and reduce the chances that women would
    receive a therapy unlikely to help.

    "If breast cancer in a patient is estrogen receptor-positive, doctors
    will usually recommend hormone therapy even though they know it will
    only work for slightly more than half the patients," said senior
    author Farrokh Dehdashti, MD, the Drs. Barry A. and Marilyn J. Siegel
    Professor of Radiology at Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology (MIR). "When hormone therapy works, it's typically quite effective, and it has milder
    side effects than some other therapies, and that's why oncologists and
    patients want to try it first. But we need to narrow down who is likely to benefit, and there really hasn't been a reliable test to accomplish that." Approximately four out of five breast cancers -- some 250,000 per year in
    the United States -- are labeled "estrogen receptor-positive," meaning
    that the cancer cells carry estrogen receptors and the tumor grows in
    response to the naturally occurring hormone estrogen. Hormone therapy
    is designed to stop the effects of estrogen on the tumor.

    A variety of drugs can be prescribed as hormone therapy, and doctors
    choose a treatment regimen depending on the patient and the specifics
    of that person's disease. Aromatase inhibitors prevent the body from
    making estrogen and are usually the first treatment chosen for hormone
    therapy. Fulvestrant blocks the estrogen receptor on cancer cells. These
    drugs usually are given to postmenopausal women. Pre-menopausal women
    often are given different hormone therapies because their ovaries still
    are producing large amounts of estrogen.

    Doctors have long suspected that the difference between women who respond
    to hormone therapy and those who don't comes down to whether the estrogen receptors on their cancer cells are working properly. If the receptors are present but nonfunctional, targeting them is unlikely to have much effect.



    ========================================================================== Dehdashti and colleagues, including co-authors Barry A. Siegel, MD, a
    professor of radiology, and Cynthia Ma, MD, PhD, a professor of medicine,
    set about measuring the functionality of estrogen receptors by taking
    advantage of a link between the estrogen receptor and a receptor for
    another hormone: progesterone.

    When estrogen receptors are stimulated, cells respond by increasing the
    number of progesterone receptor molecules on their surfaces.

    Co-author John Katzenellenbogen, PhD, a chemist at the University of
    Illinois, designed an imaging agent to probe the number of progesterone receptors on the surface of cancer cells, in collaboration with the
    late Michael Welch, PhD, then a professor of radiology at Washington University. The compound, 21-[18F] fluorofuranylnorprogesterone (FFNP), attaches to progesterone receptors and can be detected with a positron
    emission tomogrophy (PET) scan. When more progesterone receptors are
    present, the PET signal is higher.

    The researchers recruited 43 postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor- positive breast cancer. Most (86%) had metastatic disease, while 14% had locally advanced or locally recurrent disease. The majority (72%) already
    had received some form of treatment before the start of the study. Their
    prior treatment was most often a hormone therapy-based regimen.

    The women underwent a PET scan using FFNP, followed by three doses of
    estrogen over a 24-hour period, and then a second PET scan a day after
    the estrogen treatment.

    For 28 women, the PET signal in the tumor increased considerably after
    exposure to estrogen, indicating that their estrogen receptors were
    working and had responded to the hormone by triggering an increase in progesterone receptor numbers. Fifteen women showed little to no change
    in progesterone receptor numbers after estrogen treatment.

    Then, the researchers followed the participants for six months or longer
    as they underwent hormone therapy as recommended by their individual oncologists.

    The disease of all 15 women whose tumors had not responded to estrogen
    worsened within six months. Of the women whose tumors had responded,
    13 remained stable and 15 improved.

    "The goal of therapy is to control or improve disease, so if the therapy
    is likely to be ineffective, it should not be given to a patient,"
    said Dehdashti, who is also senior vice chair and division director of
    nuclear medicine at MIR.

    "We observed 100% agreement between the response to estrogen challenge
    and the response to hormone therapy, even though the participants were
    on a variety of treatment regimens. This method should work for any
    therapy that depends on a functional estrogen receptor, and it could
    provide valuable information to oncologists deciding how best to treat
    their patients." The researchers are now in the process of setting up
    a larger phase 2 clinical trial with collaborators at other institutions
    to verify their results.


    ========================================================================== Story Source: Materials provided by
    Washington_University_School_of_Medicine. Original written by Tamara
    Bhandari. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.


    ========================================================================== Journal Reference:
    1. Farrokh Dehdashti, Ningying Wu, Cynthia X. Ma, Michael J. Naughton,
    John
    A. Katzenellenbogen, Barry A. Siegel. Association of PET-based
    estradiol- challenge test for breast cancer progesterone receptors
    with response to endocrine therapy. Nature Communications, 2021;
    12 (1) DOI: 10.1038/ s41467-020-20814-9 ==========================================================================

    Link to news story: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2021/02/210202101043.htm

    --- up 7 weeks, 7 hours, 57 minutes
    * Origin: -=> Castle Rock BBS <=- Now Husky HPT Powered! (1337:3/111)