• Agriculture: A loan for lean season

    From ScienceDaily@1337:3/111 to All on Mon Nov 2 21:30:34 2020
    Agriculture: A loan for lean season
    Insights on the enormous impact seasons have in agricultural economies
    could help inform new development strategies

    Date:
    November 2, 2020
    Source:
    University of California - Santa Barbara
    Summary:
    For farmers in rural Zambia, payday comes just once a year, at
    harvest time. This fact impacts nearly every aspect of their lives,
    but until now researchers hadn't realized the true extent.



    FULL STORY ==========================================================================
    For farmers in rural Zambia, payday comes just once a year, at harvest
    time.

    This fact impacts nearly every aspect of their lives, but until now
    researchers hadn't realized the true extent.


    ========================================================================== Economist Kelsey Jack, an associate professor at UC Santa Barbara,
    sought to investigate how this extreme seasonality affects farmers' livelihoods, as well as development initiatives aimed at improving their condition. She and her coauthors conducted a two-year experiment in which
    they offered loans to help families through the months before harvest.

    The researchers found that small loans in the lean season led to higher
    quality of life, more time invested in one's own farm, and greater
    agricultural output, all of which contributed to higher wages in the
    labor market. The study, which appears in the American Economic Review,
    is part of a new wave of research re- evaluating the importance of
    seasonality in rural agricultural settings.

    Jack came to this research topic through her personal experience
    working with communities in rural Zambia over the past 12 years. She
    would often ask folks what made their lives harder, and she kept hearing
    the same story. These farmers rely on rainfall, rather than irrigation,
    for their crops. So their harvest follows the seasons. This means that
    all of their income arrives at once, during harvest time in June.

    "Imagine if you got your paycheck once a year, and then you had to make
    that last for the remaining 11 months," Jack said. This leads to what's referred to locally as the hungry season, or lean season, in the months preceding harvest.

    When households find themselves low on food and cash, they rely on
    selling labor in a practice known as ganyu to make ends meet. Instead of working on their own farms, family members work on other people's farms, essentially reallocating labor from poor families to those of better
    means -- though it's not always the same people in these positions from
    year to year.



    ==========================================================================
    When Jack spoke about this with her collaborator Gu"nter Fink at the
    University of Basel, in Switzerland, he mentioned hearing the same story
    during his work in the region. They contacted another colleague, Felix
    Masiye, chair of the economics department at the University of Zambia,
    who said that while this was a known phenomenon in Zambia, no one had researched it yet. The three decided to validate the farmers' story and quantify its effects.

    "This is basically the farmers' paper," said Jack. "They told us to
    write it and we did. And it turned out to be a really interesting story." Before even launching this project, the researchers met with communities
    and conducted a full 1-year pilot study across 40 villages. They designed
    the experiment around the input they received, including loan sizes,
    interest rates, payment timeframes and so forth. Throughout the project
    the team worked with village leadership and the district agricultural
    office, and had their proposal evaluated by institutional review boards
    in both the United States and Zambia.

    The experiment consisted of a large randomized control trial with 175
    villages in Zambia's Chipata District. It essentially spanned the whole district, Jack said. The project lasted two years and comprised over
    3,100 farmers.

    The researchers randomly assigned participants to three groups: a control
    group in which business proceeded as usual, a group that received cash
    loans, and a group that received loans in the form of maize. The loans
    were designed to feed a family of four for four months and were issued
    at the start of the lean season in January, with payments due in July,
    after harvest.



    ========================================================================== "They were designed to coincide with people's actual income flows,"
    Jack said.

    She contrasted this with most lending and microfinance in rural areas,
    which doesn't account for the seasonality of income.

    The project provided loans to around 2,000 families the first year and
    about 1,500 the second year. Some of the households were assigned to
    different groups in the second year to measure how long the effect of
    the loan persisted.

    In addition to collecting data on metrics like crop yield, ganyu wages
    and default rates, the team conducted thousands of surveys over the
    course of the study to learn about behaviors like consumption and labor.

    Overall, the results affirmed the importance of seasonal variability
    to the livelihoods of rural farmers and the impact of any economic interventions.

    "Transferring money to a rural agricultural family during the hungry
    season is a lot more valuable to that family than transferring money at
    harvest time," Jack said.

    The experiment's most striking result was simply how many people took
    the loan.

    "The take-up rates that we saw were absolutely astounding," Jack
    exclaimed. "I don't think there's an analogue for it in any kind of
    lending intervention." A full 98% of eligible households took the loan
    the first year, and more surprisingly, the second year as well. "If the
    only measure for whether this intervention helped people was whether
    they wanted it again, that alone would be enough to say people were
    better off," Jack stated.

    For the most part farmers were able to repay their loans. Only 5% of
    families defaulted in the first year, though this rose a bit to around
    15% in year two.

    Though she can't be certain, Jack suspects poorer growing conditions in
    the second year may have contributed to this increase.

    Of course, loan uptake was far from the only promising sign the
    researchers saw. Food consumption in the lean season increased by 5.5%
    for households in the treatment groups, relative to the control, which essentially bridged the difference between the hungry season and the
    harvest season.

    Families that received loans were also able to devote more energy to
    their own fields. These households reported a 25% drop in total hours
    working ganyu, which translated to around 60 hours of additional labor
    on their own land over the course of the season. This saw agricultural production rise by about 9% in households eligible for the loan, which
    was more than the value of the loan itself.

    With fewer people selling their labor, those who did choose to do ganyu
    saw their wages increase by 17 to 19% in villages where the program
    was offered.

    This was buoyed by a 40% rise in hiring from those who received loans,
    which helped address economic inequality in the community.

    What's more, Jack and her colleagues found little difference in the
    outcomes between families in the cash group versus those who received
    shipments of maize. It was a welcome finding, since cash is much cheaper
    to deliver than sacks of corn, though by no means inexpensive.

    In fact, a huge challenge the researchers faced was simply the cost of delivering and collecting the small loans. In rural Zambia people are
    spread out, financial institutions are rudimentary, and infrastructure
    like roads are underdeveloped.

    "If it was profitable to get these farmers loans then people would be
    giving them loans," Jack said. "But loans for things like food, school
    fees, and other basic needs just don't exist at reasonable interest
    rates." To account for the large transaction costs, a lender could
    simply increase the size of their loans. That way the same interest
    rate yields more money to cover the fixed costs. But according to Jack,
    most families don't want to take on the burden of a large loan.

    The alternative is to charge higher interest on small loans. Interest
    rates for the loans in the study were 4.5% per month over the course of
    half a year, which worked out to a 30% interest rate over the six-month
    loan. This is steep compared to most lenders in countries like the United States; however, it was vastly lower than the 40-100% monthly interest
    rates otherwise available in these communities.

    Several other factors contribute to these sky-high interest rates in
    addition to the transaction costs, including high risks and the difficulty
    of enforcing contracts. What's more, the low availability of creditors
    makes it essentially a lender's market. Economists continue to search
    for solutions to these challenges.

    Until recently, economists had largely written off seasonality as an
    important factor in rural development, Jack explained. But the results
    of this study underscore how everything -- from grain prices to wages to
    labor allocation - - fluctuates around the fact that everyone is poorer
    at one time of year and better off at another.

    "As a result, there are potentially large gains for interventions that
    help people smooth their very infrequent income over the rest of the
    year," she said. These can take many forms in addition to loans, from irrigation and new crops to bank accounts and farmer cooperatives --
    basically anything that helps smooth out resources or enables income to
    arrive more frequently.

    The upshot is that governments and NGOs can increase their impact by incorporating seasonality into their interventions. Making better use of resources is particularly critical in light of budget cuts and economic hardships caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.

    In fact, many of Jack's current projects have been disrupted by the
    pandemic, including another randomized control trial that sought to
    build on the understanding gleaned from this experiment. She hopes to
    resume these studies, as well as discussions with different governments,
    as conditions improve.

    Nevertheless, this study has provided a wealth of insights in its
    own right.

    "Crucially, the value of a dollar depends a lot on how many dollars you
    have," Jack said, "so you want to direct assistance to those times of
    the year when they will be most helpful."

    ========================================================================== Story Source: Materials provided by
    University_of_California_-_Santa_Barbara. Original written by Harrison
    Tasoff. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.


    ========================================================================== Journal Reference:
    1. Gu"nther Fink, B. Kelsey Jack, Felix Masiye. Seasonal Liquidity,
    Rural
    Labor Markets, and Agricultural Production. American Economic
    Review, 2020; 110 (11): 3351 DOI: 10.1257/aer.20180607 ==========================================================================

    Link to news story: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/11/201102133338.htm

    --- up 10 weeks, 7 hours, 50 minutes
    * Origin: -=> Castle Rock BBS <=- Now Husky HPT Powered! (1337:3/111)