• Consumers don't fully trust smart home t

    From ScienceDaily@1337:3/111 to All on Tue Aug 4 21:30:26 2020
    Consumers don't fully trust smart home technologies

    Date:
    August 4, 2020
    Source:
    University of Warwick
    Summary:
    Smart home technologies are marketed to enhance your home and make
    life easier. However, consumers are not convinced that they can
    trust the privacy and security of these technologies, a new study
    has shown.



    FULL STORY ========================================================================== Smart home technologies are marketed to enhance your home and make
    life easier.

    However, UK consumers are not convinced that they can trust the privacy
    and security of these technologies, a study by WMG, University of Warwick
    has shown.Smart Home technology

    ==========================================================================
    The 'smart home' can be defined as the integration of Internet-enabled,
    digital devices with sensors and machine learning in the home. The aim of
    smart home devices is to provide enhanced entertainment services, easier management of the home, domestic chores and protection from domestic
    risks. They can be found in devices such as smart speakers and hubs,
    lighting, sensors, door locks and cameras, central heating thermostats
    and domestic appliances.

    To better understand consumers perceptions of the desirability of
    the smart home, researchers from WMG and Computer Science, University
    of Warwick have carried out a nationally representative survey of UK
    consumers designed to measure adoption and acceptability, focusing on awareness, ownership, experience, trust, satisfaction and intention
    to use.

    The article 'Trust in the smart home: Findings from a nationally
    representative survey in the UK' published in the top journal PLOS ONE
    reveals their results, with the main finding that the businesses proposal
    of added meaning and value when adopting the smart home have not yet
    achieved closure from consumers, as they have highlighted concern for
    risks to privacy and security.

    Researchers sent 2101 participants a survey, with questions to assess:
    * - Awareness of the Internet of Things (IoT)
    - Current ownership of smart home devices - Experiences of their
    use of smart home devices


    =========================================================================
    - Trust in the reliability and competence of the devices - Trust
    in privacy - Trust in security - Satisfaction and intention to use
    the devices in the future, and intention to recommend it to others
    The findings suggest consumers had anxiety about the likelihood of a
    security incident, as overall people tend to mildlySmart home tehnology
    agree that they are likely to risk privacy as well as security breach when using smart home devices, in other words they are unconvinced that their privacy and security will not be at risk when they use smart home devices.



    ==========================================================================
    It also emerged that when asked to evaluate the impact of a privacy breach people tend to disagree that its impact will be low, suggesting they
    expect the impact of a privacy breach to be significant. This emerges
    as a prominent factor influencing whether or not they would adopt smart
    home technology, furthermore making it less likely.

    Other interesting results highlight:
    * - More females than males have adopted smart home devices over
    the last
    year, possibly as they tend to run the house and find the technology
    helpful - Young people ages 18-24) were the earliest adopters of
    smart home technology, however older people (ages 65+) also adopted
    it early, possibly as they have more disposable income and less
    responsibilities - - e.g. no mortgage, no dependent children -
    People aged 65 and over are less willing to use smart home devices
    in case of unauthorised data collection compared to younger people,
    indicating younger people are less aware of privacy breaches -
    Less well-educated people are the least interested in using smart
    home devices in the future, and that these might constitute market
    segments that will be lost to smart home adoption, unless their
    concerns are specifically addressed and targeted by policymakers
    and businesses.

    Dr Sara Cannizzaro, from WMG, University of Warwick comments:Dr Sara Cannizzaro, WMG, University of Warwick: "Our study underlines how
    businesses and policymakers will need to work together to act on the sociotechnical affordances of smart home technology in order to increase consumers' trust.

    This intervention is necessary if barriers to adoption and acceptability
    of the smart home are to be addressed now and in the future.

    "Proof of cybersecurity and low risk to privacy breaches will be key
    in smart home technology companies persuading a number of consumers to
    invest in their technology." Professor Rob Procter, from the Department
    of Computer Science, University of Warwick, adds:Professor Rob Procter, Department of Computer Science at the University of Warwick: "Businesses
    are still actively promoting positive visions of what the smart home means
    for consumers (e.g., convenience, economy, home security)... However, at
    the same time, as we see from our survey results, consumers are actively comparing their interactional experiences against these visions and are
    coming up with different interpretations and meanings from those that
    business is trying to promote."

    ========================================================================== Story Source: Materials provided by University_of_Warwick. Note: Content
    may be edited for style and length.


    ========================================================================== Journal Reference:
    1. Sara Cannizzaro, Rob Procter, Sinong Ma, Carsten Maple. Trust in the
    smart home: Findings from a nationally representative survey in
    the UK.

    PLOS ONE, 2020; 15 (5): e0231615 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231615 ==========================================================================

    Link to news story: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/08/200804111449.htm

    --- up 2 weeks, 6 days, 1 hour, 55 minutes
    * Origin: -=> Castle Rock BBS <=- Now Husky HPT Powered! (1337:3/111)