• How our brains remain active during fami

    From ScienceDaily@1337:3/111 to All on Tue Jul 14 21:30:24 2020
    How our brains remain active during familiar, repetitive tasks

    Date:
    July 14, 2020
    Source:
    University of Cambridge
    Summary:
    New research, based on earlier results in mice, suggests that our
    brains are never at rest, even when we are not learning anything
    about the world around us.



    FULL STORY ==========================================================================
    New research, based on earlier results in mice, suggests that our brains
    are never at rest, even when we are not learning anything about the
    world around us.


    ==========================================================================
    Our brains are often likened to computers, with learned skills
    and memories stored in the activity patterns of billions of nerve
    cells. However, new research shows that memories of specific events and experiences may never settle down. Instead, the activity patterns that
    store information can continually change, even when we are not learning anything new.

    Why does this not cause the brain to forget what it has learned? The
    study, from the University of Cambridge, Harvard Medical School and
    Stanford University, reveals how the brain can reliably access stored information despite drastic changes in the brain signals that represent
    it.

    The research, led by Dr Timothy O'Leary from Cambridge's Department
    of Engineering, shows that different parts of our brain may need to
    relearn and keep track of information in other parts of the brain as it
    moves around. Their study, published in the open access journal eLife,
    provides some of the first evidence that constant changes in neural
    activity are compatible with long term memories of learned skills.

    The researchers came to this conclusion through modelling and analysis
    of data taken from an experiment in which mice were trained to associate
    a visual cue at the start of a 4.5-metre-long virtual reality maze with
    turning left or right at a T-junction, before navigating to a reward. The results of the 2017 study showed that single nerve cells in the brain continually changed the information they encoded about this learned task,
    even though the behaviour of the mice remained stable over time.

    The experimental data consisted of activity patterns from hundreds of
    nerve cells recorded simultaneously in a part of the brain that controls
    and plans movement, recorded at a resolution that is not yet possible
    in humans.



    ========================================================================== "Finding coherent patterns in this large assembly of cells is challenging,
    much like trying to determine the behaviour of a swarm of insects by
    watching a random sample of individuals," said O'Leary. "However, in
    some respects the brain itself needs to solve a similar task, because
    other brain areas need to extract and process information from this same population." Nerve cells connect to hundreds or even thousands of their neighbours and extract information by weighting and pooling it. This
    has a direct analogy with the methods used by pollsters in the run up
    to an election: survey results from multiple sources are collected and 'weighted' according to their consistency.

    In this way a steady pattern can emerge even when individual measurements
    vary wildly.

    The Cambridge group used this principle to construct a decoding algorithm
    that extracted consistent, hidden patterns within the complex activity of hundreds of cells. They found two things. First, that there was indeed
    a consistent hidden pattern that could accurately predict the animal's behaviour. Second, this consistent pattern itself gradually changes over
    time, but not so drastically that the decoding algorithm couldn't keep
    up. This suggests that the brain continually modifies the internal code
    that relays information between different internal circuits.

    Science fiction explores the possibility of transferring our memories
    and experiences into hardware devices directly from our brains. If future technology eventually allows us to upload and download our thoughts and memories, we may find that our brain cannot interpret its own activity
    patterns if they are replayed many years later. The concept of an apple
    -- its colour, flavour, taste and the memories associated with it --
    may remain consistent, but the patterns of activity it evokes in the
    brain may change completely over time.

    Such conundra will likely remain speculative for the immediate future,
    but experimental technology that achieves a limited version of such
    mind reading is already a reality, as this study shows. Brain-machine interfaces are a rapidly maturing technology, and human neural interfaces
    that can control prosthetics and external hardware have been in clinical
    use for over a decade. The work from the Cambridge group highlights a
    major open challenge in extracting reliable information from the brain.

    "Even though we can now monitor brain activity and relate it directly to memories and experiences, the activity patterns themselves continually
    change over a period of several days," said O'Leary, who is a Lecturer in Information Engineering and Medical Neuroscience. "Our study shows that in spite of this change, we can construct and maintain a relatively stable 'dictionary' to read out what an animal is thinking as it navigates a
    familiar environment.

    "The work suggests that our brains are never at rest, even when we are not learning anything about the external world. This has major implications
    for our understanding of the brain and for brain-machine interfaces and
    neural prosthetics."

    ========================================================================== Story Source: Materials provided by University_of_Cambridge. The original
    story is licensed under a Creative_Commons_License. Note: Content may
    be edited for style and length.


    ========================================================================== Journal Reference:
    1. Michael E Rule, Adrianna R Loback, Dhruva Raman, Laura N Driscoll,
    Christopher D Harvey, Timothy O'Leary. Stable task information
    from an unstable neural population. eLife, 2020; 9 DOI:
    10.7554/eLife.51121 ==========================================================================

    Link to news story: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/07/200714082850.htm

    --- up 25 weeks, 2 hours, 34 minutes
    * Origin: -=> Castle Rock BBS <=- Now Husky HPT Powered! (1337:3/111)