I'll guess the original NOS or possibly MFNOS. JNOS might have been a bit too much for floppies. MFNOS and Phil's NOS were always somewhat compact in size.
Yeah, no idea now. :)
Avon wrote to All <=-
On 20 May 2021 at 08:03a, Vk3jed pondered and said...
I'll guess the original NOS or possibly MFNOS. JNOS might have been a bit too much for floppies. MFNOS and Phil's NOS were always somewhat compact in size.
Yeah, no idea now. :)
Folks, a gentle reminder to please change the subject of the thread if
the subject indeed changes :) It makes it a bit easier for people following along to know what is and is not being discussed. Cheers ears
:)
On 05-20-21 19:39, Avon wrote to All <=-
Folks, a gentle reminder to please change the subject of the thread if
the subject indeed changes :) It makes it a bit easier for people following along to know what is and is not being discussed. Cheers ears
:)
linking, like I have. :P The subject header is simply a label for the actual thread (whatever that may be about ;) ).
On 05-21-21 13:07, Avon wrote to Vk3jed <=-
On 21 May 2021 at 09:47a, Vk3jed pondered and said...
linking, like I have. :P The subject header is simply a label for the actual thread (whatever that may be about ;) ).
My point exactly... and your discussions were not about fsxNet
feedback.
I only mention it as others have commented about this very issue in general when offering feedback about echomail conversations...
Sysop: | Shaun Ewing |
---|---|
Location: | Blue Mountains, Australia |
Users: | 193 |
Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
Uptime: | 232:32:37 |
Calls: | 138 |
Calls today: | 2 |
Files: | 187,813 |
Messages: | 321,475 |